It does not make a difference what industry your organisation operates. There are a few advantages of connecting an incident database to a risk register. In this post, we feature the benefit of combining the two incidents and risks and the experiences that such an association can bring.

Incident Management and Risk Management

Successful companies utilise incident management software to catch and report incidents and unfriendly occasions. Incidents include near misses, and also, mishaps that brought about fatalities, wounds, ailments or property harm. A few companies additionally empower their workers to report incidents remotely and in the field through a mobile application.

Another reasonable step many successful companies leverage is the use of risk management software to enhance the way toward recognising, surveying, relieving and observing all risks all through the venture. Risk programming is more powerful than spreadsheets to keep up and refresh a risk register that incorporates all risks and controls.

Advantages of Connecting Both Risk and Incident Management Together

While there are individual benefits related to combining both incident and risk management software, yet there are significantly more prominent advantages when both of them are connected. More specifically, four kinds of significant insights can be accessed through this connection. These are:

1) Incidents help to recognise already obscure risks. Each time an incident happens, you should check whether a comparing risk was already distinguished. If not, at that point the new risk ought to be investigated and assessed. If there are numerous comparative incidents, it might demonstrate a pattern is indicating a noteworthy risk.

2) Incidents (in)validate the probability of risk. As a significant aspect of a risk assessment, you have decided the likelihood of an unfriendly occasion. Since an incident is a risk that has emerged, the number of incidents can enable you to check if the possibility you have built up is as yet substantial, or if it should be refreshed.

3) Incidents (in)validate the seriousness of risk. As a feature of a risk assessment, you have additionally decided the severity of the effects of an antagonistic situation. The results of an incident compared to a particular risk can enable you to confirm if the seriousness level you have built up is even substantial, or if it should be refreshed on the off chance that it was overestimated or disparaged.

4) Incidents help to assess the adequacy of controls. By a wide margin, the most critical advantage of connecting incidents and risks is the way it can determine the viability of controls. On the off chance that there are numerous antagonistic occasions of a similar sort related to a particular risk, it might show that the control isn’t compelling. The invert is likewise valid. For instance, if 3-5 unfavourable occasions were ordinary every year for a particular risk, yet “just” one happened, it might show that the control is more viable than initially thought.

The four things above ought not to occur in separation. For instance, numbers #2, #3 and #4 will cooperate. The adequacy of control will be assessed by considering any progressions to the probability and seriousness of the effects of an unfriendly occasion. Changes to the remaining risk may likewise evaluate the adequacy of the control.

Conclusion

One major takeaway from this article is the need to create a way for both incidents and risks to be fully integrated into one robust EHS Management software that works seamlessly together. This guarantees a consistent trade of information between various applications and capacities, including information on incidents, risks, and controls.

Luckily, Beakon’s all-in-one software has this capability. You can take advantage of a free trial today. Try our software free, and we are sure the ease of use and fantastic interface will make keep using it for your safety management needs.